πŸ”¬
Minerva AI (EN)
  • πŸ‘‹Welcome to Minerva AI
  • STUDIES & FINDINGS
    • ☝️Abstract
    • πŸ“Introduction and related works
    • πŸ’‘Model overview
      • ♾️Convolutional neural network - CNN
      • ✍️Dropout techniques
      • 🧠Long short-term memory (LSTM)
      • πŸ™†Methodology
      • πŸ”—Data collection and merging
      • πŸ› οΈModel architecture
      • βž•Dataset and Parameter Optimization
      • πŸ‘ŒResults and discussion
      • βš“Trading Philosophy & Method
      • βž—Basic algorithm
      • 🌠Results
    • πŸ‘‰Conclusion
  • PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
    • πŸ‘€Vision and development roadmap
    • 🌟Revenue models
    • πŸͺ™Tokenomics
  • TEAM
    • πŸ‘₯Founding team
  • RESOURCES
    • πŸ“—References
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Result of predictive model
  • Table 5. Metric of errors
  • Trading result based on signals generation
  • Table 6. Key indicators in trading strategy
  1. STUDIES & FINDINGS
  2. Model overview

Results

PreviousBasic algorithmNextConclusion

Last updated 1 year ago

Result of predictive model

The models were trained with the optimized parameters provided in the respective papers. The accuracy of our model has been found to be outstanding. You can find the training and testing metrics for the referenced papers in Table 5. The classification accuracy of our model, considered as a model predicting continuous variables, outperforms our baseline benchmark. The model exhibits better recall and accuracy, as clearly demonstrated by the f1-score compared to the two reports by Kara Y et al. (2011) and Hoseinzade E et al. (2019). The LSTM model considers data from the past 30 days and captures patterns before making predictions. While the CNN convolutions view the numbers as static images, the output results will be the same if the numbers are identical, even in increasing or decreasing trends. The LSTM model built upon the CNN model helps address this issue and thus makes the model more intelligent:

Table 5. Metric of errors

Hoseinzade (2019)
Kara Y (2011)
Minerva (2023)

Metrics

Train - Test

Train - Test

Train - Test

F1-score

0.046 - 0.16

0.009 - 0.07

0.575 - 0.581

Accuracy

0.473 - 0.496

0.382 - 0.366

0.539 - 0.533

The performance of our model on the training and testing sets can be observed below in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.

Figure 6. Performance in training dataset

Trading result based on signals generation

The model in this report is compared to traditional buy-and-hold strategies in the Spot market and the Futures market of Solana over a period of 1 year. The traditional buy-and-hold method incurred a loss of -88% from January 1, 2022, to February 14, 2023. In contrast, our model in the Futures market with automated TP/SL optimization generated a profit of 288% during the same testing period. This model yielded significantly higher profits compared to the traditional buy-and-hold strategy.

Table 6. Key indicators in trading strategy

PAIR
SOL/USDT Perpetual

Backtesting period

Jan 2022 - Jan 2023

Beginning Balance

$5,000

No. trades

63

% largest profitable trade

134.99%

% largest loss trade

-3.27%

No. win trades

38

Win rate

60.32%

Loss rate

39.68%

Average profit / capital

7.85%

Average loss / capital

-0.38%

Profit Factor

20.77

Ending Balance

$19,440

Ending Profit

$14,440

Profit Margin

288.80%

Average holding day(s) of loss trade

2.5

Average holding day(s) of win trade

8.9

The data provided outlines the effectiveness of trading based on signals for SOLUSDTPERP, a futures asset traded on Binance, from January 2022 to January 2023. The initial investment capital was $5,000, and a total of 63 trades were executed. The highest profit rate of winning trades was 134.99%, while the highest loss rate of losing trades was -3.27%. The win rate was 60.32%, and the loss rate was 39.68%. On average, the trades generated an average profit of 7.85% on the initial capital, with an average loss of -0.38%. The Profit factor was 20.77, indicating significantly higher total profits compared to total losses. The ending capital was $19,440, resulting in a final profit of $14,440. The impressive return on initial capital reached 288.80%. The average holding time for losing trades was 2.5 days, while the average holding time for winning trades was nearly 9 days. The relatively short average holding time for losing trades indicates that the trading system has effectively identified stop-loss positions to limit losses. Meanwhile, the longer average holding time for winning trades demonstrates that the system has been able to identify and capitalize on favorable market conditions to maximize profits. Overall, the data shows that the signal-based trading strategy in the Futures market is effective in generating profits by leveraging market opportunities while effectively managing take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) through effective risk management.

Figure 7. Performance in testing dataset
Figure 8 Trading results based on SOL/USDT signals
πŸ’‘
πŸŒ